## Introduction
## Why is Hakimi’s trial trending now? The surge in search interest stems from multiple factors. First, the trial’s timing aligns with Morocco’s preparations for the 2026 World Cup, where Hakimi is a key figure. Second, French prosecutors confirmed in February 2026 that the case would proceed to trial after Hakimi’s appeal to dismiss it was rejected. Third, Hakimi’s recent social media statements, where he alleged judicial bias due to his fame, have fueled public discourse. Additionally, the case highlights ongoing discussions about sexual violence in sports, particularly in football, which has drawn global attention.
## Legal background of the case The allegations stem from a 2023 incident where a French woman, then 24, accused Hakimi of raping her at his home in Paris. The Nanterre public prosecutor’s office initiated a preliminary investigation in March 2023, followed by an investigating judge ordering a trial in February 2026. Hakimi, 27, has consistently denied the accusations, arguing that his fame influenced the legal proceedings. His recent appeal to dismiss the trial was rejected, and he continues to proclaim his innocence.
## Impact on Hakimi’s career and travel The legal battle has far-reaching implications beyond the courtroom. Hakimi, a 97-cap Morocco international, is a pivotal figure in Moroccan football and a symbol of the team’s historic 2022 World Cup run. However, his participation in the 2026 tournament could be jeopardized if he faces travel restrictions to co-host countries like Canada or Mexico. For context, Ghanaian midfielder Thomas Partey was denied entry to Canada ahead of his country’s World Cup opener due to pending rape charges, underscoring the legal risks Hakimi may face.
## Public and expert reactions The case has sparked polarized reactions. Hakimi’s defense team argues that the trial is a miscarriage of justice driven by his celebrity status, while advocates for sexual violence survivors see it as a necessary step toward accountability. Rachel-Flore Pardo, the plaintiff’s lawyer, stated that the decision brings «relief and hope» to her client, emphasizing that the trial could set a precedent for addressing impunity in sports. The broader conversation reflects growing scrutiny of how high-profile athletes are treated in legal systems worldwide.